GPT-6 Luna

OpenAICoding model6 posts

Every GPT-6 Luna comparison on aivs.tv: 6 side-by-side posts from X against other models on the same prompt, 3 with cost or time reported. Compare coding ability, cost and speed from real tests.

Posts

6

Summary

GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) appears in 6 posts on aivs.tv, next to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Claude Haiku 5.5, Claude Opus 5.5, GLM 5.3, Grok 4.7, GPT-6 Sol and 3 more. Tasks: lava lamp: small models, 15-second motion graphic for a designer, cloth simulation, 4 to 4,096 faces, Tokyo Tower 3D model, three GPT-6 models, lava lamp, 4 models and animated coffee pour, 4 GPT models. Reported for GPT-6 Luna: 42.8 s in @bridgebench's lava lamp: small models, 13 min / 47.5K tokens in @noclipepe's cloth simulation, 4 to 4,096 faces and 43 s in @bridgebench's lava lamp, 4 models. @bridgebench picks GPT-6 Luna as the best result in lava lamp: small models.

What each post reports for GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna: cost, time and tokens as stated in each post
PostTimeCostTokensAuthor’s verdictOriginal
Lava lamp: small models@bridgebench42.8 s——Author’s pickX post
15-second motion graphic for a designer@Iampuranthapa————X post
Cloth simulation, 4 to 4,096 faces@noclipepe13 min—47,500—X post
Tokyo Tower 3D model, three GPT-6 models@seki_anos————X post
Lava lamp, 4 models@bridgebench43 s———X post
Animated coffee pour, 4 GPT models@Ashishx29————X post

Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.

Who won where

1

Matchups with GPT-6 Luna

9

Spellings we map to GPT-6 Luna

“GPT 6 Luna”, “Luna”