Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max Preview

1 post244 likes34.8K views

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max Preview in real side-by-side tests: 1 post from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.

Posts

1

Same prompt, separate runs

1

Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.

Summary

Claude Fable 5 and Qwen 3.8 Max Preview appear together in 1 post on X: voxel soccer goal, one shot (@Zmthanh). In @Zmthanh's voxel soccer goal, one shot, Qwen 3.8 Max Preview was cheaper ($0.01 vs $1.15) and Claude Fable 5 used fewer tokens (22K tokens vs 23K tokens), as reported in the post. According to @Zmthanh, Qwen 3.8 Max Preview wins: the same one-shot result for about 100x less money. (The author’s view.)

What each post reports

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen 3.8 Max Preview: cost, time and tokens as stated in each post
PostModelTimeCostTokensAuthor’s verdictOriginal
Voxel soccer goal, one shot@ZmthanhQwen 3.8 Max Preview—$0.0123,000Author’s pickX post
Voxel soccer goal, one shot@ZmthanhClaude Fable 5—$1.1522,000—X post

Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.

Who won where

1

Prompts shown in the posts

Create a single HTML file with Three.js (CDN) for a simple voxel-style soccer animation. A blocky player dribbles past 2 defenders and scores a spectacular goal with celebration particles. Colorful stadium look. Output ONLY the full HTML code. — @Zmthanh

Models

Related matchups