Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder 1.0

2 posts14 likes2.4K views

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder 1.0 in real side-by-side tests: 2 posts from X where both got the same prompt, with cost or time from every post. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.

Posts

2

Same prompt, separate runs

1

Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.

Summary

Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Wonder 1.0 appear together in 2 posts on X: 3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking (@melvynx) and battle of Waterloo voxel diorama (@ItsCuthulhu). All are part of larger lineups with other models. In @melvynx's 3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking, Claude Opus 5.5 was cheaper ($0.54 vs $1.70) and Muse Wonder 1.0 was faster (21 min vs 1 h 34 min), as reported in the post. In @ItsCuthulhu's battle of Waterloo voxel diorama, Muse Wonder 1.0 was faster (9.1 min vs 11.1 min), as reported in the post.

What each post reports

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder 1.0: cost, time and tokens as stated in each post
PostModelTimeCostTokensOriginal
3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking@melvynxClaude Opus 5.51 h 34 min$0.54—X post
3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking@melvynxMuse Wonder 1.021 min$1.70—X post
Battle of Waterloo voxel diorama@ItsCuthulhuClaude Opus 5.511.1 min——X post
Battle of Waterloo voxel diorama@ItsCuthulhuMuse Wonder 1.09.1 min——X post

Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.

Prompts shown in the posts

build a 3D lava lamp — @melvynx
Build a moving 3D voxel diorama of the Battle of Waterloo with cannons firing and destroying buildings. — @ItsCuthulhu

Models

Related matchups