DeepSeek V4.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
1 post103 likes18.1K views
DeepSeek V4.1 vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next in real side-by-side tests: 1 post from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
Posts
1Summary
DeepSeek V4.1 and Qwen 3.8 Flash Next appear together in 1 post on X: cinematic 3D spiral galaxy (@WescheNex1q). It is part of larger lineups with other models. In @WescheNex1q's cinematic 3D spiral galaxy, Qwen 3.8 Flash Next was faster (25.6 min vs 38 min) and DeepSeek V4.1 used fewer tokens (82.3K tokens vs 94.8K tokens), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cinematic 3D spiral galaxy@WescheNex1q | DeepSeek V4.1 | 38 min | — | 82,300 | X post |
| Cinematic 3D spiral galaxy@WescheNex1q | Qwen 3.8 Flash Next | 25.6 min | — | 94,800 | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.