Matchup

Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.7

4 posts36 likes2.3K views

Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.7 in real side-by-side tests: 4 posts from X where both got the same prompt; 2 posts report cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.

Posts

4

Same prompt, separate runs

1

Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.

Summary

Gemini 4 Argon and Grok 4.7 appear together in 4 posts on X: fold a paper plane and fly it (@mkeremturhan), dam break, 4 models with costs (@RafaCrackYT), futuristic Tesla racing game (@MATKA_r) and radial engine, 4 models (@Nitocnt). 3 of them are part of larger lineups with other models. In @mkeremturhan's fold a paper plane and fly it, Gemini 4 Argon was faster (8 min vs 49 min), as reported in the post. In @RafaCrackYT's dam break, 4 models with costs, Gemini 4 Argon was faster (41 min vs 1 h 35 min), as reported in the post. According to @MATKA_r, grok 4.7 got cooked while argon did a decent job. (The author’s view.)

What each post reports

Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.7: cost, time and tokens as stated in each post
PostModelTimeCostTokensAuthor’s verdictOriginal
Fold a paper plane and fly it@mkeremturhanGemini 4 Argon8 min———X post
Fold a paper plane and fly it@mkeremturhanGrok 4.749 min———X post
Dam break, 4 models with costs@RafaCrackYTGrok 4.71 h 35 min———X post
Dam break, 4 models with costs@RafaCrackYTGemini 4 Argon41 min———X post
Futuristic Tesla racing game@MATKA_rGemini 4 Argon———Author’s pickX post
Futuristic Tesla racing game@MATKA_rGrok 4.7————X post
Radial engine, 4 models@NitocntGemini 4 Argon————X post
Radial engine, 4 models@NitocntGrok 4.7————X post

Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.

Who won where

1

Models

Related matchups