Matchup
Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
1 post0 likes55 views
Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in real side-by-side tests: 1 post from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
Posts
1Same prompt, separate runs
4Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.
Summary
Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash appear together in 1 post on X: smartwatch product-reveal film (@maker_evan). It is part of larger lineups with other models. In @maker_evan's smartwatch product-reveal film, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was cheaper ($0.33 vs $2.16) and Claude Opus 5.5 was faster (21 min vs 1 h 01 min), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smartwatch product-reveal film@maker_evan | Claude Opus 5.5 | 21 min | $2.16 | — | X post |
| Smartwatch product-reveal film@maker_evan | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 1 h 01 min | $0.33 | — | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Prompts shown in the posts
12s cinematic 3D product reveal film for a smartwatch called ORBIT — @maker_evan
Models
Related matchups
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra22 posts · 609.7K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon13 posts · 132K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.512 posts · 232.3K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol9 posts · 143.3K viewsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.55 posts · 9.5K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.74 posts · 1.8K views