Matchup
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3
3 posts169 likes45.4K views
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 in real side-by-side tests: 3 posts from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
Posts
3
Same prompt, separate runs
1Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.
Summary
Claude Opus 5.5 and GLM 5.3 appear together in 3 posts on X: same game, 4 models, no fixes (@wikiwayne), 15-second motion graphic for a designer (@Iampuranthapa) and three 3D scenes, 8 models (@domsilvestre). All are part of larger lineups with other models. In @wikiwayne's same game, 4 models, no fixes, GLM 5.3 was cheaper ($0.0989 vs $0.4496) and Claude Opus 5.5 was faster (3.3 min vs 4.1 min), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same game, 4 models, no fixes@wikiwayne | Claude Opus 5.5 | 3.3 min | $0.4496 | — | X post |
| Same game, 4 models, no fixes@wikiwayne | GLM 5.3 | 4.1 min | $0.0989 | — | X post |
| 15-second motion graphic for a designer@Iampuranthapa | Claude Opus 5.5 | — | — | — | X post |
| 15-second motion graphic for a designer@Iampuranthapa | GLM 5.3 | — | — | — | X post |
| Three 3D scenes, 8 models@domsilvestre | GLM 5.3 | — | — | — | X post |
| Three 3D scenes, 8 models@domsilvestre | Claude Opus 5.5 | — | — | — | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Models
Related matchups
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon47 posts · 1.1M viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra32 posts · 614.4K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol22 posts · 158K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.515 posts · 245.3K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10178 posts · 191.6K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder 1.06 posts · 488.1K views