Matchup
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7
2 posts56 likes9.4K views
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7 in real side-by-side tests: 2 posts from X where both got the same prompt, with cost or time from every post. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
Posts
2
Same prompt, separate runs
2Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.
Summary
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 appear together in 2 posts on X: smartwatch product-reveal film (@maker_evan) and Flappy Bird with costs in Command Code (@naymur_dev). All are part of larger lineups with other models. In @maker_evan's smartwatch product-reveal film, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was cheaper ($0.33 vs $3.98) and faster (1 h 01 min vs 1 h 14 min), as reported in the post. In @naymur_dev's Flappy Bird with costs in Command Code, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was cheaper ($0.0089 vs $0.20), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Feedback rounds | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smartwatch product-reveal film@maker_evan | Grok 4.7 | 1 h 14 min | $3.98 | — | — | X post |
| Smartwatch product-reveal film@maker_evan | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 1 h 01 min | $0.33 | — | — | X post |
| Flappy Bird with costs in Command Code@naymur_dev | Grok 4.7 | — | $0.20 | — | — | X post |
| Flappy Bird with costs in Command Code@naymur_dev | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | — | $0.0089 | — | 0 | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Prompts shown in the posts
12s cinematic 3D product reveal film for a smartwatch called ORBIT — @maker_evan